Some
business
owners
believe
incentive
compensation
plans
don't
work.
Many
don't,
and
the
reasons
vary.
In
some
cases,
employees
are
just
not
money-motivated.
In
most
cases,
however,
an
incentive
plan
that
isn't
working
is
a
poorly-designed
incentive
plan.
In
a
recent
meeting
of
Chief
Executive
Boards
International,
one
member
said
his
"discretionary
bonus"
had
become
a
Christmas
season
entitlement.
Several
members
contributed
good
ideas
on
how
to
construct
an
incentive
plan
that
works,
whether
for
sales,
operations,
shipping/receiving,
etc.
If you want to redesign or install an incentive plan for your business, it's important to get it right -- the first time, if possible. To help you with that, here are 8 key questions to ask about your plan design:
If you want to redesign or install an incentive plan for your business, it's important to get it right -- the first time, if possible. To help you with that, here are 8 key questions to ask about your plan design:
- Is
it
Meaningful?
--
If
the
employees
do
what
you
want
them
to
do,
is
the
reward
at
stake
enough
to
get
their
attention?
This
is
a
failing
of
many
incentive
programs.
Employers
put
microscopic
incentives
on
top
of
comfortable
base
salaries.
Employees
quickly
conclude,
"So,
if
I
show
up
I
get
paid
well.
If
I
knock
myself
out
I
get
paid
scarcely
more."
If
you
want
more
variable
pay,
you
may
have
to
reduce
base
pay.
Here's
an
article
on
one
way
to
fix
that
"not
meaningful"
problem...
- Is
it
Achievable?
--
If
Superman
couldn't
ring
the
bell,
your
employees
won't
try
to,
either.
The
moment
they
figure
out
the
goal
is
unachievable
(at
least
by
ordinary
humans),
the
incentive
value
is
lost.
Design
in
some
flexibility,
such
as
reward
thresholds
that
are
set
annually,
in
response
to
market
conditions.
Then
you
can
move
the
carrot
within
reach.
- Is
it
in
sight?
--
Business
owners
love
annual
payouts
--
they're
simpler,
happen
only
once,
and
smooth
out
ups
and
downs
over
the
year.
Few
employees
can
keep
their
eye
on
a
reward
a
year
away.
Most
are
living
paycheck-to-paycheck,
and
the
idea
of
an
annual
payout
is
simply
beyond
their
attention
span
--
perhaps
beyond
what
they
visualize
as
their
future
with
your
company.
The
carrot
is
so
far
away,
it's
beyond
the
horizon.
Think
quarterly,
even
monthly
or
project-by-project
in
your
plan
design.
- Is
it
clear
what
you
want?
--
Can
they
connect
the
dots
between
the
result
you
want
(the
measure/metric
of
performance)
and
specifically
what
you
want
them
to
do?
The
connections
between
their
actions
and
cost
reduction,
waste
reduction
and
productivity
improvement
are
clear
to
you.
Don't
expect
those
connections
to
be
clear
to
them.
You
might
test
this
by
asking exactly what
they're
doing
to
get
to
the
goal.
- Is
it
within
their
control?
--
More
importantly,
do
they
see
exactly
how
their
own
behavior,
effort
and
accomplishment
directly
connects
to
the
incentive?
I
contend
that
incentive
comp
plans
tied
to
"overall
results"
or
"company
profitability"
or
even
"department
performance",
if
the
department
is
big,
hardly
ever
work.
The
average
employee
just
can't
connect
the
dots
between
what
they
do
and
the
overall
result
--
it's
just
a
big
squishy
idea
that
they
can't
get
a
hold
of.
Instead, tie incentive pay to something they can relate to -- units produced, cycle time, inventory reduction (turns), Accounts Receivable (DSO), etc. depending on what's within the workgroup's direct control & visibility.
- Is
it
fair?
--
Can
the
good
things
I
do
be
undermined
by
poor
performance
on
the
part
of
others?
Sales
compensation,
for
example,
that
ignores
market
conditions
causes
sales
people
to
get
rich
when
things
are
booming
and
starve
to
death
when
demand
slows.
A
commission
structure
with
annually-adjusted
quotas
is
a
lot
more
flexible
than
something
cast
in
stone.
Here's
a
way
to
incorporate
that
idea...
- Does
it
pass
the
Martini
Rule?
--
Can
the
employee
explain
it
to
their
spouse
over
only
1
martini?
- Is the reward something they want? -- Perhaps money isn't their objective (believe it or not). For many people, time off is a lot bigger motivator than money. Here's an article on that topic...


